27Jan/103
Despicable
This is supposedly the reason to seal material relating to the death of Dr David Kelly for 70 years.
"I requested that the postmortem report should not be disclosed for 70 years as I was concerned that the publication of that report would cause [Kelly's] daughters and his wife further and unnecessary distress," Hutton said.
Absolutely despicable. People are ready to denounce 'conspiracy theorists' at every turn, and here we have clear evidence of material being deliberately buried. Oh well, it joins the Dunblane massacre, where 106 documents were sealed for 100 years...
January 27th, 2010 - 23:07
how often does this happen..?
That the publication of a report specifically related to the death of subject should be withheld for the benefit of the nearest and dearest, when these publications are implicitly, explicitly flogged like big-tittied hairy girls from cabin 4.
January 27th, 2010 - 23:09
Well, with Dunblane it was ‘because children’s names feature in the documents’ – except then it emerged that of the 106 documents, the overwhelming majority contained no children’s names.
It just stinks using supposed concern for the Kelly family as the justification, after all, Kelly’s death was seen as the result of him being hung out to dry by the establishment.
January 31st, 2010 - 01:40
I note that these documents are withheld from the very people who should be most privy to same.
In other words, the poor unfortunate bastards whose kin perished (at Dunblane, Lockerbie, let’s go further Cromwell Street and miles beyond), are denied access to forensic details of their loved ones death because it might distress them further..!
How convenient is the 70year non disclosure for the lizardkings I wonder..?