White line morality from Helen Mirren
From Dame Helen Mirren :
"I loved coke. I never did a lot, just a little bit at parties," said Mirren. "But what ended it for me was when they caught Klaus Barbie, the Butcher of Lyon, in the early 80s. He was hiding in South America and living off the proceeds of being a cocaine baron. And I read that in the paper, and all the cards fell into place and I saw how my little sniff of cocaine at a party had an absolute direct route to this fucking horrible man in South America."
This begs a few questions :
1) When Klaus Barbie was deemed to have lived out his natural span, why not resume tooting?
2) Helen Mirren, presumably, until the devastating Barbie Bomb dropped, believed that South American cocaine barons were, what? Pillars of the community?
3) The breaking of the law never mattered, just the fact that a Nazi was involved. Perhaps Mirren will be giving up eating babies next year when she gets an email from the Wiesenthal Centre. "If only I'd known!" she squealed, "If only I'd known!"
***
Maybe the 80s drug awareness poster could be rejigged - "Nazis screw you up"
Failed excursions and the return of the sleeping men…
Two weekends and two failed attempts to do what we planned to do.
In the first instance, the Maokong Gondolas were closed due to the threat of a thunderstorm.
So the Saturday was spent travelling to and not riding the Maokong Gondolas.
In the second instance, the Longshan temple in Taipei was inaccessible due to a 30000 strong march protesting the Taiwanese government.
So the Saturday was spent travelling to and not entering the Longshan temple.
***
I discovered my new favourite drink in the world - dongguan tea. With ice. Delicious doesn't even begin to describe it.
***
Further to the previous, I internationalised my photography of sleeping men this weekend. The photo below is potentially the finest effort yet, as it also features the sleeping man's bicycle stocked with some (all?) of his worldly goods.

Q re: Keanu Reeves
Why must the hero of every cyberpunk movie be Keanu Reeves?
It is as if Keanu Reeves travelled into the future and slaughtered all his rivals for these roles.
If he did, that would be far more interesting and praiseworthy than his cardboard performances.
Wait, am I being unfair?
To cardboard...
Living in the world of Ballard…
I am residing in a riverside apartment complex in Asia beside an intersection of elevated highway.
This captures something of the sensation...

Evidence for the existence of a Russian model…
The letting agent informed me that a Russian model lived in the apartment before me (this is probably as close to a Russian model as I will ever be). They were all excited at remembering this fact, and one woman then openend her desk and produced a signed photograph of a beautiful Russian lady.
"Now you live there," she said. For the first time in my life, I felt guilty for not being a Russian model.
On the day I moved in, I found a small bottle of vodka in a cupboard.
"Ah, the Russian model," I thought. I smelled the vodka. And then I poured it away, just in case there was something amiss.
Two days later, I found, while cleaning, a beaded necklace with a large wooden cross. It was under the bed.
"Ah, the Russian model," I thought. I looked at the necklace, I looked at the cross. And then I threw it away, as I don't need a beaded necklace with a large wooden cross.
I lay in bed that night, thinking about it - how neatly it all fitted, the Russian model, her signed photograph, the bottle of vodka, the necklace and its wooden cross.
The next day, while examining the shelves (there was nothing to do, clearly), I found a jeweled egg. "Ah, the Russian model," I thought. I looked at the jeweled egg, and as I turned it, it fell open. Inside a Taiwanese penny was wedged in a slit that was not designed for Taiwanese pennies. "That slit was designed for a ring! Now it holds only a Taiwanese penny!"
"You're stating the obvious now," I thought.
I put the egg back together and put the back-together egg on the shelf. "Such are the surprises that come from examining shelves," I thought, by way of conclusion. I had now justified filling the idle moments of the rest of my life with the examination of shelves. I saw myself, aged 90, feeling along a shelf, and thinking of the Russian model. But only able to gasp, "Egg... penny... slit... Russian..."
And being dismissed as mad.
Finally, yesterday, in the mail, there was a visa extension application. The name listed was preposterously Russian and preposterously long.
"Ah, the Russian model," I thought. Somebody is working very very hard to convince me that she was here... to the point where I am beginning to wonder if she ever existed...
What next? The intercom buzzing, "Ivan and Igor are waiting in the lobby..."
When gay men miss social events…
When gay men miss social events, why do those present automatically assume they are having sex?
This phenomenon has been witnessed by myself across two continents.
Any thoughts?
Olympics – Full spectrum dominance
I planned to refrain from writing about The Olympics, but this article in The Times spurred me into action. It concerns the achievements of swimmer Michael Phelps and the financial rewards that may await him:
"His supreme achievement also drew comparison with Tiger Woods, the world's No 1 golfer, and Roger Federer, then the world's dominant tennis player, while back home his name was raised in the same sentences as Hideki Matsui, of the New York Yankees baseball team (who earns $19 million a year), and Dirk Nowitzki, of the Dallas Mavericks basketball team ($18 million a year)."
The mention of Woods and Federer (although his situation is a little more complex) is instructive. As the wishes of corporations become pre-eminent at the Olympic Games, it is notable that rather than close competition and personal rivalries, the trend is towards full spectrum dominance, athletes who destroy the field, athletes who are on another level. This Shock and Awe form of sporting performance is, to my mind, depressing, and at odds with the reasons why an audience traditionally watches sport, to see a title disputed, for a spectacle where the result is in doubt.
With a Phelps and a Woods and, previously, a Federer (this dominance of Federer has now been re-branded as a colossal rivalry with Rafael Nadal, and tennis is all the better for it), what you witness is a display, an exhibition, and, ultimately, a procession towards victory. Perhaps this is why, with such athletes, the focus switches towards breaking records, and calibrating them against the best, the best from their own sport, and often, particularly with Woods, the best from every sport.
To me, this is not interesting, but is wholly understandable. From the point of view of corporations signing up sports talent, the aura of invincibility and of destiny that enfolds one of these athletes (and that corporations nurture further with ego-boosting, access to labs, bespoke equipment, mucho $$$, etc) is the ultimate sure-fire thing, with no need to be exposed to ridicule (or worse, finanical penalty) by oscillations in form. For myself, much as I enjoy the occasional viewing of a sporting masterclass, the notion of the result never being in doubt becomes over time a compelling counter-reason for not tuning in to begin with.
Sport that doesn't feature a true contest is, in some way, not sport at all.
